Australian Constitution Centre
  • About Us
  • The Australian Constitution
    • What is the Australian Constitution
    • The Writers of the Australian Constitution
    • The Australian Constitution
  • Origins of the Constitution
    • Where did the Australian System of Government come from?
    • Timeline
  • The Six Principles
    • Democracy
    • The Rule of Law
    • Separation of Powers
    • Federalism
    • Nationhood
    • Rights
  • The High Court
    • The First High Court
    • The Role of the High Court
    • Democracy – The Right to vote survives incarceration
    • The Rule of Law - Miners pay rise is unauthorised
    • The Rule of Law – The government overreached when it banned the Communist Party
    • The Rule of Law - Even a murderer deserves a fair trial
    • The Rule of Law - The High Court limits Federal Government spending powers
    • Separation of powers – Well may we say, “God save the Queen”
    • Separation of powers – The powers of State Courts
    • Separation of powers – Parliament cannot make laws to keep evidence from the High Court
    • Federalism – Engineers Union succeeds in the High Court, expanding Federal power
    • Nationhood - The Constitution saves the Franklin River
    • Rights - NSW Government compulsorily acquires wheat during World War I
    • Rights - High Court overturns 200 years of common law
  • Resources
    • Australian Constitution Centre Resources
    • FAQs
    • Glossary
    • Take the Knowledge Quiz
    • Introduction to the education program
    • Lesson Plans >
      • Lesson Resources ACHASSK134
    • Links to other relevant organisations
Picture
Miners strike in 1911. Office staff had to unload coal. Source: Museums Victoria

HIGH COURT CASE STUDY: THE RULE OF LAW

Miners pay rise is unauthorised 
R v Hibble; Ex parte Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd (1920)

Facts of the case
Disputes about pay and conditions in the coal industry were common before 1920. Mine owners, struggling after World War I, were cutting the wages of workers. Strikes and lockouts followed. The Government led by Labor Prime Minister Billy Hughes decided to put forward legislation to resolve the problems.

​The Parliament passed the Industrial Peace Act 1920. A Tribunal for the coke industry was set up (coke is fuel made from coal). Charles Hibble was Chairman of the Tribunal, with an equal number of employer and employee representatives. The intention was that both the workers and the bosses could get an equal say over the rates of pay and conditions.

The Tribunal published an Award which provided:
(1) All adult day wage workers receive an increase of 3 shillings per day; (2) contract workers receive an increase of 17.5 per cent; (3) boys and youths receive an increase of 20 per cent.

A meeting of the Tribunal was held to discuss the Award. Five of the nine members attended and only four supported it.

Big mining company BHP brought a case in the High Court seeking to prohibit the Award from coming into force.

Issues considered by the court
The Court had to consider whether the Award was validly made with the authority of the Coke Industry Special Tribunal. They had to consider that a majority of the Tribunal had not voted for it.
Decision
The Court decided that the Award was invalid because it had not been lawfully made. This meant that the miners did not receive a pay rise.

The Court found that it was impossible to see that the Award was the Award of anyone except Hibble. It was not an Award of the Special Tribunal.

The case is an important illustration of the rule of law.

Background to the case
Mr Charles Hibble, as Chairman of the Coke Industry Special Tribunal, tried to resolve a huge dispute between mining company BHP and their workers. The case uncovered that Hibble had referred to the Tribunal Award as ‘the award which I have made’ in the meeting transcript.

Many considered the conditions and pay rates in the mines as in need of improvement. Mining was a dangerous occupation. One tactic used by employers in disputes was to lock workers out from their job, without pay.

Charles Hibble remained chairman of the Coke Industry Special Tribunal after the case in the High Court. He continued to resolve disputes. In 1924 he ordered striking workers back on the job.

​Later in the 1920s, arbitration boards were set up by both the State and Federal Governments. This was a further attempt to resolve pay disputes and strikes.
Did you know?
  • Awards are legal documents that outline minimum pay rates and conditions of employment. 
  • There are 122 industry or occupation awards that cover most people who work in Australia.
  • Today, the Fair Work Commission is Australia’s independent national workplace relations tribunal. 
  • Mining is one of Australia’s major industries representing about one third of our exports.
​Click here to download a PDF of the High Court Case Study: R v Hibble (1920)
Picture
Mining unionists were locked outside the company gates for rejecting pay cuts. Source: Archives Program, Australian National University
Picture
Chief Justice Knox's bench. Source: High Court of Australia
Picture
The coal strike and the majesty of the law Source: B.E. Minns, National Library of Australia
Print Friendly and PDF
Picture
Contact Us
Picture

​​Telephone: 1800 009 855
Exhibition Address: High Court of Australia, Canberra 
email: info@australianconstitutioncentre.org.au
​



​
  • About Us
  • The Australian Constitution
    • What is the Australian Constitution
    • The Writers of the Australian Constitution
    • The Australian Constitution
  • Origins of the Constitution
    • Where did the Australian System of Government come from?
    • Timeline
  • The Six Principles
    • Democracy
    • The Rule of Law
    • Separation of Powers
    • Federalism
    • Nationhood
    • Rights
  • The High Court
    • The First High Court
    • The Role of the High Court
    • Democracy – The Right to vote survives incarceration
    • The Rule of Law - Miners pay rise is unauthorised
    • The Rule of Law – The government overreached when it banned the Communist Party
    • The Rule of Law - Even a murderer deserves a fair trial
    • The Rule of Law - The High Court limits Federal Government spending powers
    • Separation of powers – Well may we say, “God save the Queen”
    • Separation of powers – The powers of State Courts
    • Separation of powers – Parliament cannot make laws to keep evidence from the High Court
    • Federalism – Engineers Union succeeds in the High Court, expanding Federal power
    • Nationhood - The Constitution saves the Franklin River
    • Rights - NSW Government compulsorily acquires wheat during World War I
    • Rights - High Court overturns 200 years of common law
  • Resources
    • Australian Constitution Centre Resources
    • FAQs
    • Glossary
    • Take the Knowledge Quiz
    • Introduction to the education program
    • Lesson Plans >
      • Lesson Resources ACHASSK134
    • Links to other relevant organisations